
Excerpted from Dr Colgan's forthcoming book, Strong Bones, scheduled for publication in Spring 2008. Lavishly illustrated in his famous style.
At our horse stud, Blennerhassett Equestrian on Salt Spring Island, BC, I'm watching one of our young riders jumping a speedy gelding. Oops! She mis-times a jump and - whack! - takes a sliding fall. A bit winded she scrambles up immediately and re-mounts, pride hurt more than body. Young bones are strong and supple, and highly resistant to breaking, so lasting injuries are rare. But, for a rider in their fifties, a fall from a horse can be serious business, because old bones are likely to be weak and brittle, and prone to snap like twigs. Women are especially at risk.
Health Canada is coy about revealing the true numbers, but the US lets it all hang out. Despite myriads of drugs that purport to keep bones strong, and 60 years of promotion of milk and similar malarkey, one in every two American women over 50 now show osteopenia or bone weakening. By age 80, three-quarters of all American women have osteoporosis. Their bones are no longer strong enough to safely support the weight of the body. Between the two diseases that s more than 30 million women, and the rate is rising fast.1,2 If these folk suffer a fall... well... North America has one of the highest rates of hip fracture in the world.3
If anyone tells you that this loss of bone is inevitable - don't believe them. If you want to ride horses, or ski or skate, or cycle or hike, or dance, or do any vigorous activity lifelong, you should learn how to grow strong bones. The major reason most people lose their bones as they age, is not that medicine doesn't know how to save bone. It is rather that dissemination of this knowledge to the public is poor to non-existent. Family doctors often try, but their efforts are buried by the huge forces of the pharmaceutical lobby and the drug marketplace.
In a nutshell, these pharmaceutical forces work against public knowledge because they are driven solely by profit. Please don't give me the bleeding hearts ethics nonsense. Medicine, despite all the caring folk that work in it, is controlled by profit. I know because I own pharmaceutical shares, and have been to the shareholder meetings, and have also been a consultant to the Canadian and US governments.
There is no profit at all in showing people how to save their bones themselves, by simple supplementation and small changes in lifestyle. Consequently, neither our lobby-driven medical policy nor commercial enterprise is going to help you. Unless you acquire the right knowledge to save your bones, however, medical statistics over the last 60 years, show that you will very likely join the majority of the North American population, and become progressively spineless, hipless , and legless as you age.
There is also very little profit in doing the right medical chemistry to keep bones strong, that is to develop man-made drugs that improve bone growth, (Man-made drugs, drugs that do not occur in Nature, are the only chemicals that can be easily patented, and thus the only chemicals that offer the protected profit margins required to snare the investments necessary for their development.
Why are there almost zero effective man-made drugs to grow new bone? Simply because the chemistry is very difficult. Thousands of substances have been expensively tried, but we are no further ahead than we were in the 1960s. The success rate is less than one in a thousand. And even those successes either turn out to cause unwanted growth elsewhere in the body, including cancers, or are simply very expensive but doubtfully patentable variations on the natural substances carnitine and parathyroid hormone. Any new drug that fails to win both FDA approval and an ironclad patent, leaves development losses in the $multi-millions. Inventing drugs to grow new bone has become a route to pharmaceutical bankruptcy. Understandably, most companies ditched it decades ago.
The crux of the problem is the general problem of human chemistry. We have become very good at the crude chemical tasks of inhibiting or destroying processes of Nature. Because we can blow up the largest tree with a handful of plastic explosive, we tend to forget that we still have a very long way to go to create one simple living leaf.
Bones are far more complicated than leaves. Bones are constantly being rebuilt every day by specialized cells called osteoblasts. They pull minerals in and organize them to grow new bone in strict accordance with DNA codes that we are only just beginning to decipher. In beautiful synchrony with osteoblasts, other specialized cells called osteoclasts, are constantly dismantling old, damaged, and worn out bone. They are the demolition crew, the bone garbage disposal. It is a much easier chemical task to develop drugs that destroy the action of osteoclasts, that is drugs which keep the garbage bone around longer.
Drug companies have developed a slew of chemicals called biphosphonates and selective estrogen receptor modulators that inhibit osteoclasts. They also use expensive variations on the natural hormone calcitonin to inhibit bone breakdown. About 99% of the approved drugs used today to treat osteopenia and osteoporosis do just that, stockpile the garbage bone right in your skeleton.
Consequently, even though treatment with these drugs increases scores on bone density tests, thus is highly touted as successful, the bones themselves get steadily weaker. Meanwhile the patients believe the problem is taken care of and pay only scant attention to supplying the structural nutrients that are absolutely essential every day for the body to grow new bone. Even if we allow generously for the greater loss of bone caused by the general aging of our population, the pharmaceutical conservation of garbage bone, and the almost total lack of public knowledge of the nutrients required to grow bone, are the dominant causes of the epidemic of osteoporosis in North America today.
At the Colgan Institute, we have worked for 33 years to successfully increase real bone strength in thousands of individuals, many of whom are at or near what is termed the "fracture line" when they first come to see us. Our program is very successful. Because of the deplorable and worsening state of North America's bones, I am going to share our program, gratis, with everyone who reads Vista.
See next issue to save your bones
References
1. Centers for Disease Control http://www.cdc.gov/nceh/dls/osteoporosis.htm Accessed 7 September 2007
2. Health Benchmarks 2007 bcbsil.com/provider/pdf/osteo_screen_women_fract.pdf Accessed 7 September 2007
3. Colgan M. Nutrition for Champions. Vancouver: Science Books, 2007.
4. National Institute of Health http://ods.od.nih.gov/factsheets/calcium.asp Accessed 7 September 2007
5. Elisaf M, Milionis H, Siamopoulos K. Hypomagnesemic hypokalemia and hypocalcemia:Clinical and laboratory characteristics. Mineral Electrolyte Metab 1997;23:105-12.
6. Institute of Medicine. Food and Nutrition Board. Dietary Reference Intakes: Calcium, Phosphorus, Magnesium, Vitamin D and Fluoride. National Academy Press: Washington, DC, 1999.
7. Tucker KL, Hannan MT, Chen H, Cupples LA, Wilson PW, Kiel DP. Potassium, magnesium, and fruit and vegetable intakes are associated with greater bone mineral density in elderly men and women. Am J Clin Nutr 1999;69:727-36.
8. Heaney RP, Rafferty K. Carbonated beverages and urinary calcium excretion. Am J Clin Nutr, 2001; 74: 343-7.
9.Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes for water, potassium, sodium, chloride, and sulfates. Washington DC: National Academy Press, 2004.
10. New SA, et al. Nutritional influences on bone mineral density: a cross-sectional study in premenopausal women. Am J Clin Nutr, 1997; 65:1831-39.
11. Tucker KL, et al. Potassium, magnesium and fruit and vegetable intake are associated with greater bone mineral density in elderly men and women. Am J ClinNutr, 1999; 69:727-736.>
12. Frowell HC. From normotension to hypertension in Kenyans and Ugandans. EastAfric Med J, 1980; 57:167-173.
13. New SA, et al. Dietary influences on bone mass and bone metabolism: further evidence of a positive link between fruit and vegetable consumption and bone health. Am J Clin Nutr, 2000; 71:142-151.
14. Meunier, PJ, et al The effects of strontium ranelate on the risk of vertebral fracture in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis, N Engl J Med, 2004, 350:459-68.
15, Reginster, J.Y, et al. Prevention of early postmenopausal bone loss by strontium ranelate: the randomized, two-year, double-masked, dose-ranging, placebo-controlled PREVOS trial. Osteoporos Int, 2002, 13:925-31.
16. Latkoczy C, Strontium isotope ratio measurements in prehistoric human bone samples by means of high-resolution inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (HR-ICP-MS) Anal At Spectrom<>, 1998, 13, 561 - 566.
17. O'Donnell S, et al. Strontium ranalate for preventing and treating postmenopausal osteoporosis. Cochrane Database Sys Rev, CD005326 Oct 18, 2006.
18. Veith R, et al. Efficacy and safety of vitamin D3 intake exceeding the Lowest Observed Adverse Effects Level. Am J Clin Nutr, 2001; 73: 288-94.>
19. Veith R, et al. Winter vitamin D insufficiency is common in young Canadian women and their vitamin D intake does not prevent it. Eur J Clin Nutr, 2001; 55: 1091-97.
20. Cumming RG, et al. Calcium intake and fracture risk: results form the study of osteoporotic fractures. Am J Epidemiol, 1997; 145: 926-34.
21. Trivedi DP, et al. Effect of four monthly oral Vitamin D on fractures od men and women living in the community.: randomized, double-blind controlled trials, Brit Med J, 2003; 326: 469.
22. Price PA. The role of vitamin K-dependent proteins in bone metabolism. Ann Rev Nutr, 1988: 565-83.
23. Weber K. Vitamin K and bone health. Nutrition, 2001; 17:1024.
24. Shearer MJ. Vitamin K. Lancet, 1995; 345:229-34.>
25. Cockayne S, et al. Vitamin K and the prevention of fractures. Arch Intern Med.2006;166:1256-1261
26. Ikeda, et. al. Intake of fermented soybeans, natto, is associated with reduced bone loss in postmenopausal women: Japanese Population-Based Osteoporosis (JPOS) Study. J. Nutr. 136: 1323-1328, 2006.
27. Sebastian A, et al. Improved mineral balances and skeletal metabolism in post-menopausal women treated with potassium bicarbonate. New Engl J Med, 1994; 330 1776-81.
28. Wolff I, et al. The effect of exercise training programs on bone mass: a meta-analysis of published controlled trials in pre- and postmenopausal women. Osteoporosis Int 1999; 9:1-12.
29. Bissinger M. Exercise guidelines for women with osteoporosis. Menopaus Management 2000;9(1):8-19.
30. Nelson ME, et al. Effects of high-intensity strength training on multiple risk factors for osteoporotic fractures: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 1994;272:1909-1914.
31. Donaldson, et al. Effect of prolonged bed rest on bone mineral. Metabolism. 1970, 19: 1071-1084.
32. Colgan M. The New Power Program. Vancouver Apple Publishing 2001.